English Learning: International Climate Diplomacy

Dialogue

Current Situation

International climate diplomacy refers to the global efforts by countries to address climate change through negotiations, agreements, and cooperation. It’s a complex field involving various stakeholders – governments, international organizations, civil society, and businesses – all working towards a common goal of mitigating global warming and adapting to its impacts.

A cornerstone of this diplomacy is the Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, which aims to limit global warming to well below 2, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels. Central to the Agreement are Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), where each country sets its own climate action targets.

Key challenges include:

• Differing National Interests: Countries have diverse economic structures, development stages, and political priorities, making consensus difficult.
• Historical Responsibility: Developing nations often argue that developed nations, having historically contributed the most to emissions, should bear a greater burden of climate action and provide financial support.
• Funding and Technology Transfer: Mobilizing sufficient finance and ensuring the transfer of green technology to developing nations is a persistent hurdle.
• Pacing and Ambition: Striking a balance between ambitious targets (like net-zero emissions) and practical implementation, while ensuring climate justice, remains a significant diplomatic task.

Despite these challenges, international climate diplomacy continues through regular Conferences of the Parties (COPs) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), where nations review progress, negotiate new commitments, and strengthen global cooperation. There’s growing recognition of the urgency and shared responsibility, driving innovation in renewable energy and increased public awareness about reducing one’s carbon footprint.

Key Phrases

• Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs): Climate action plans submitted by individual countries under the Paris Agreement.
  • Example Sentence: The latest climate summit focused on strengthening each country’s Nationally Determined Contributions to meet the 1.5°C target.
• Net-zero emissions: Achieving an overall balance between greenhouse gas emissions produced and greenhouse gas emissions taken out of the atmosphere.
  • Example Sentence: Many countries have pledged to reach net-zero emissions by 2050 to combat global warming effectively.
• Paris Agreement: A legally binding international treaty on climate change adopted in Paris in 2015.
  • Example Sentence: The Paris Agreement provides the framework for global climate action, including adaptation and mitigation efforts.
• Conference of the Parties (COP): The supreme decision-making body of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
  • Example Sentence: Significant diplomatic breakthroughs often occur during the annual Conference of the Parties, known as COP.
• Climate justice: A term used to frame global warming as an ethical and political issue, rather than purely environmental or physical in nature, advocating for equity among nations and individuals.
  • Example Sentence: Advocates for climate justice emphasize that climate solutions must address social and economic inequalities.
• Green tech: Technology whose use is environmentally friendly or designed to mitigate the impact of human activity on the environment.
  • Example Sentence: Investing in green tech like advanced solar panels and wind turbines is crucial for a sustainable future.
• Carbon footprint: The total amount of greenhouse gases (including carbon dioxide and methane) that are generated by our actions.
  • Example Sentence: Individuals can reduce their carbon footprint by using public transport and consuming less meat.
• Renewable energy: Energy from a source that is not depleted when used, such as wind or solar power.
  • Example Sentence: The transition to renewable energy sources is a key component of most climate action plans.
• Developing nations / Developed nations: Terms used to categorize countries based on their economic development and industrialization levels, often relevant in discussions of climate responsibility and capacity.
  • Example Sentence: Climate finance often involves developed nations providing support to developing nations for climate adaptation and mitigation projects.
• Historical responsibility: The concept that developed countries, due to their past industrialization and resulting high emissions, bear a greater moral and financial obligation to address climate change.
  • Example Sentence: The principle of historical responsibility is frequently raised by developing countries in international climate negotiations.

Grammar Points

Practice Exercises

English Learning Content: Middle East Oil Negotiations

Dialogue

Current Situation

The Middle East remains a crucial region for global oil production due to its vast reserves and strategic location. Negotiations among major oil-producing nations, particularly within the OPEC+ alliance (Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries plus non-OPEC allies like Russia), are ongoing and significantly influence the global oil market. These discussions primarily revolve around setting production quotas – how much crude oil each member country will pump – to balance supply with global demand.

Factors influencing these high-stakes negotiations include geopolitical events, economic growth forecasts, the pace of the global energy transition towards renewable sources, and the individual revenue needs of producer nations. Decisions made during these negotiations directly impact international oil prices, affecting everything from gasoline costs for consumers to the economic stability of nations worldwide. The delicate balance between ensuring sufficient supply and maintaining favorable prices for producers is a constant challenge, making these negotiations a complex and continuously evolving aspect of international relations and economics.

Key Phrases

Grammar Points

Practice Exercises

Show Answers

English Learning Content: Africa’s Political Transitions

Dialogue

Current Situation

Africa is currently experiencing a dynamic period of political transitions, marked by both progress and significant challenges. While many nations have made strides towards democratic governance and stability since the end of colonial rule and the Cold War, recent years have seen a worrying trend of “democratic backsliding” in several countries. This often involves constitutional changes designed to extend presidential terms, suppression of opposition, and limitations on civil liberties.

A notable aspect of these transitions is the resurgence of military coups d’état, particularly in West and Central Africa, driven by factors such as perceived government corruption, insecurity, and economic hardship. However, it’s not all negative; there’s also a powerful surge in youth activism, with young people increasingly using social media and organized protests to demand accountability, better governance, and a voice in their future. Economic pressures, internal conflicts, and the growing influence of external powers also play significant roles in shaping the continent’s evolving political landscape, creating a complex tapestry of hope and struggle for sustainable development and democracy.

Key Phrases

• Political transitions: Significant changes in the political system or leadership of a country.
  • Example: The country has experienced several rapid political transitions in the last decade.
• Democratic backsliding: The decline in the quality of democracy or a retreat from democratic norms.
  • Example: Critics argue that recent legal changes indicate a worrying trend of democratic backsliding.
• Coup (d’état): The sudden, illegal, and often violent overthrow of a government by a small group, typically the military.
  • Example: News broke last night of a military coup in the neighboring state.
• Constitutional changes: Amendments or alterations made to a country’s constitution, the supreme law of the land.
  • Example: The president proposed controversial constitutional changes to extend term limits.
• Youth activism: The efforts of young people to bring about social or political change through various actions like protests, campaigns, and advocacy.
  • Example: The recent protests were largely fueled by powerful youth activism.
• Political instability: A state where a government is subject to frequent changes, unable to maintain power, or facing significant challenges to its authority.
  • Example: Economic hardship often contributes to widespread political instability.
• Accountability: The obligation of an individual or organization to account for its activities, accept responsibility for them, and disclose the results in a transparent manner.
  • Example: Citizens are demanding greater accountability from their elected officials.

Grammar Points

• Present Perfect Continuous (for ongoing situations)

  Used to talk about actions that started in the past and are still continuing up to the present moment, often emphasizing the duration.

  • Structure: Subject + have/has been + verb-ing
  • Example from dialogue: “It’s been quite a roller coaster.” (Meaning it started in the past and continues to be one.)
  • Further example: “Activists have been campaigning for greater transparency for years.” (The campaigning started in the past and is still ongoing.)

• Modal Verbs for Speculation/Possibility (might, could)

  Used to express possibilities, probabilities, or uncertainties about present or future events.

  • Might: Suggests a weaker possibility.
  • Could: Suggests a general possibility or capability.
  • Example: “Economic challenges, internal conflicts… can all contribute to political instability.” (Here, ‘can’ expresses possibility/causation.)
  • Further example: “The new policy might lead to more unrest.” (It’s a possibility, but not certain.)
  • Further example: “New leaders could emerge from the youth movement.” (It’s a possible outcome.)

• Passive Voice (for focusing on the action or outcome)

  Often used in news and reports, especially when the agent (who did the action) is unknown, unimportant, or obvious, or when the focus is on the action itself.

  • Structure: Subject + be (various forms) + past participle
  • Example: “It’s about countries that were making progress…” (Active implied, but often in news we say “The government was overthrown by the military.”)
  • Further example: “Several political prisoners were released yesterday.” (The focus is on the prisoners and the action, not necessarily who released them.)
  • Further example: “New laws are being debated in parliament.” (Focus on the laws and the ongoing debate.)

Practice Exercises

Exercise 1: Fill in the Blanks

Complete the sentences using the appropriate key phrase from the list below. (political transitions, democratic backsliding, coup, constitutional changes, youth activism, political instability, accountability)

1. The country’s long history of __________ has made it difficult to establish lasting peace.
2. Citizens are demanding more __________ from their leaders regarding public funds.
3. The recent __________ to remove presidential term limits sparked widespread protests.
4. Many fear that the new government’s actions represent a step towards __________.
5. The military announced a __________ early this morning, taking control of the capital.
6. The continent is currently undergoing significant __________ as new leaders and systems emerge.
7. A wave of __________ is pushing for environmental protection and social justice.

Exercise 2: Sentence Transformation (Active to Passive Voice)

Rewrite the following active sentences into the passive voice, focusing on the action or the receiver of the action.

1. The military leaders *overthrew* the government.
2. Journalists *are reporting* the ongoing protests.
3. The citizens *will elect* a new president next year.
4. Corrupt officials *have diverted* billions of dollars.

English Learning: EU Common Defense Plan

Dialogue

Alice: Hey Bob, have you heard about the EU’s common defense plan?

Bob: Alice! Yeah, I saw a headline. Does that mean we’re all getting matching camouflage onesies?

Alice: Haha, not quite, Bob. More like coordinated military strategies, not a European fashion trend.

Bob: Oh, so no EU-branded tanks with little flags on them then? A shame. My inner child is crushed.

Alice: Your inner child needs to read more news. It’s about strengthening security and cooperation among member states.

Bob: Right, right. So, like a super-sized neighborhood watch, but with actual missiles?

Alice: Essentially, yes, but for an entire continent. The idea is to rely less on NATO for certain operations and build up their own capabilities, aiming for what they call strategic autonomy.

Bob: So if someone leaves their garden gate open in Poland, France sends over a drone?

Alice: Okay, you’re simplifying a bit. It’s for serious threats, external security. Think joint exercises, shared intelligence, and potentially rapid deployment forces for crises.

Bob: Rapid deployment forces… So if my pizza delivery is late, can I call the EU’s rapid deployment forces?

Alice: Bob, please. It’s for things like cyberattacks, terrorism, maybe even large-scale natural disaster response. Serious stuff, not your pepperoni emergency.

Bob: Ah, so less about my pepperoni emergency and more about actual emergencies. Got it. Do you think it’ll actually happen though? Feels like a big lift.

Alice: It’s definitely a long-term goal with a lot of political and logistical challenges, but the current geopolitical climate is certainly pushing for it.

Bob: Makes sense. I guess having a unified front beats everyone fending for themselves. Less ‘every country for itself,’ more ‘continental solidarity.’

Alice: Exactly! Now, about that pizza… I could go for some continental solidarity right now.

Bob: My rapid deployment forces are already en route to the fridge for leftovers. Crisis averted!

Current Situation

The concept of a European Union Common Defense Plan has gained significant traction in recent years, particularly in response to evolving global security challenges and the desire for greater strategic autonomy. While the EU has long engaged in various security and defense initiatives, the idea of a truly “common defense” or a “European army” is a more ambitious goal. It aims to enhance the EU’s capacity to act independently in crisis management, complementing rather than replacing NATO, which remains the primary collective defense organization for many EU members.

Key drivers include Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, growing instability in neighboring regions, and a recognition that the EU needs to pool resources and coordinate efforts more effectively. Initiatives like the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund (EDF) are steps towards this goal, fostering joint military projects, research, and capability development among member states. Challenges remain, such as sovereignty concerns, differing national priorities, and funding. However, the ongoing geopolitical shifts underscore the urgency and potential benefits of a more integrated European defense capability.

Key Phrases

• Common defense plan: A strategy or initiative where multiple countries agree to defend each other if one is attacked. The EU is exploring a new common defense plan to enhance security across the continent.
• Strategic autonomy: The ability of a country or bloc of countries to act independently in international affairs, particularly in defense and security, without relying heavily on external powers. Achieving strategic autonomy is a key goal for the European Union’s foreign policy.
• Geopolitical climate: The political situation and power relationships around the world, especially as they relate to geography and international relations. The current geopolitical climate has made international cooperation on defense more urgent.
• Unified front: A situation where a group of people or countries present a combined and consistent opposition or support for something. The EU aims to present a unified front against external threats.
• Rapid deployment forces: Military units that are specifically trained and equipped to be quickly moved to a crisis area. The organization discussed establishing rapid deployment forces for humanitarian aid and security operations.

Grammar Points

1. Conditional Sentences (Type 1)

Type 1 conditional sentences describe real and possible situations in the future. They are used to talk about what will happen if a certain condition is met. The structure is: If + simple present, will + base verb.

• Example from dialogue: “So if someone leaves their garden gate open in Poland, France sends over a drone?” (Bob uses a variation here, close to a Zero Conditional for a hypothetical general truth, but Type 1 is for future possibilities.)
• Standard Type 1 Example: If the EU develops a stronger defense, it will be better prepared for crises.
• Another Example: If they agree on funding, the plan will move forward.

2. Modal Verbs for Possibility and Speculation

Modal verbs like may, might, could, can, will, would are used to express varying degrees of possibility, probability, or speculation about present or future events.

• Can/Could: Express ability or possibility. “Can” for general possibility, “could” for a weaker or more hypothetical possibility. The EU can achieve this goal with strong political will. A common defense could significantly alter the global security landscape.
• May/Might: Express possibility or probability (often interchangeable, “might” can imply slightly less certainty). They may vote on the new proposal next month. The plan might face opposition from some member states.
• Will/Would: “Will” expresses a strong prediction or certainty, “would” is often used in conditional sentences or for hypothetical situations. This new approach will strengthen European security. I would support a common defense if it meant greater stability.

3. Phrasal Verbs

Phrasal verbs are combinations of a verb and an adverb or a preposition (or both) that, when used together, have a meaning different from the original verb. They are very common in informal and conversational English.

• Build up: To increase, develop, or strengthen something over time. The EU wants to build up its own defense capabilities.
• Rely on: To depend on someone or something. Many countries currently rely on NATO for their security.
• Push for: To strongly support or demand that something happen or be done. Geopolitical events are pushing for a more unified European defense.
• Fend for themselves: To take care of oneself without help from anyone else. In a crisis, countries might struggle if they have to fend for themselves.

Practice Exercises

Exercise 1: Vocabulary Matching

Match the key phrase with its correct definition.

1. Strategic autonomy
   a) Military units trained for quick deployment.
   b) The ability to act independently in defense and security.
   c) A combined and consistent stance by a group.
2. Unified front
   a) The political situation and power relationships globally.
   b) A strategy for mutual defense.
   c) A combined and consistent stance by a group.
3. Rapid deployment forces
   a) Military units trained for quick deployment.
   b) The ability to act independently in defense and security.
   c) To develop or strengthen over time.

Answers:

1. b) The ability to act independently in defense and security.
2. c) A combined and consistent stance by a group.
3. a) Military units trained for quick deployment.

Exercise 2: Sentence Completion

Complete the sentences using an appropriate modal verb (will, might, could) or phrasal verb (build up, rely on, push for, fend for themselves).

1. If the member states agree, they _________ a strong common defense. (will / might / could)
2. Some smaller nations often _________ larger allies for their security. (rely on / push for)
3. The EU is trying to _________ its cybersecurity capabilities. (build up / fend for themselves)
4. The new policy _________ face some opposition, but it’s essential for long-term security. (will / might / could)

Answers:

1. will (or might/could for slightly less certainty)
2. rely on
3. build up
4. might (or could)

Exercise 3: Short Answer Questions

Answer the following questions based on the dialogue and “Current Situation” section.

1. What humorous comparison does Bob make about the common defense plan at first?
2. According to Alice, what is a key reason the EU wants to “build up their own capabilities”?
3. What does “strategic autonomy” mean in the context of the EU defense plan?
4. Name two types of serious threats Alice mentions the common defense plan is for.

Answers:

1. Bob jokingly asks if it means everyone is “getting matching camouflage onesies” or EU-branded tanks.
2. Alice mentions that the idea is to rely less on NATO for certain operations.
3. Strategic autonomy means the ability of the EU to act independently in defense and security without relying heavily on external powers.
4. Alice mentions cyberattacks, terrorism, and large-scale natural disaster response. (Any two are correct.)

English Learning Content: U.S. Immigration Policy Changes

Dialogue

Alice: Hey Bob, did you see the news about the latest U.S. immigration policy changes? It’s wild!

Bob: Oh, Alice, I barely keep up with my own Netflix queue, let alone international policy. What’s the latest twist in the bureaucratic rollercoaster?

Alice: Well, they’re making it tougher for some, easier for others, and I swear, every time I read about it, I need a flowchart and a lawyer.

Bob: A flowchart and a lawyer? Sounds like they’re trying to turn regular citizens into immigration experts by force.

Alice: Exactly! I heard a rumor that they’re even considering a “pop quiz” for visa applicants. Imagine failing a pop quiz on U.S. history because you mixed up your presidents.

Bob: (Laughing) A pop quiz? “Who was the 14th president, and what’s his stance on artisanal cheese?” I’d be deported before I even got to the cheese part!

Alice: Right? And then there’s the whole debate about highly skilled workers. My cousin, who builds robots that can make soufflés, is wondering if his skills are “highly skilled” enough.

Bob: Robots making soufflés? That sounds essential! Surely, they’re not going to turn away a culinary robot genius. That’s practically a national treasure.

Alice: You’d think so! But the definitions keep shifting. It’s like playing a game of legislative whack-a-mole.

Bob: Whack-a-mole is an accurate description. So, is there any silver lining to these changes, or is it all just more hoops to jump through?

Alice: Some say it’s streamlining certain processes, but honestly, it feels more like they’re just rearranging the furniture on the Titanic.

Bob: Ouch, a Titanic analogy. That’s a bit grim, even for a Monday. So, if I ever decide to, say, open an artisanal cheese shop in Vermont, I should probably hire an immigration consultant immediately?

Alice: Probably a team of them, Bob. And maybe start studying for that hypothetical pop quiz. Just in case they ask about the history of cheddar.

Bob: (Sighs dramatically) My American dream of cheese will have to wait. Or maybe I’ll just learn to make soufflé-making robots and claim “essential worker” status.

Alice: Now that’s a strategy, Bob! You might just sneak through the cracks with a robot army.

Bob: A delicious, fluffy robot army. Maybe I’ll be the one writing the new policies then!

Current Situation

The U.S. immigration system is a complex and frequently evolving area of policy. Recent discussions and administrative changes often focus on several key aspects: enhancing border security, adjusting pathways for highly skilled workers (such as through H-1B visas), facilitating family reunification, and modifying asylum and refugee procedures. These policy shifts can involve stricter enforcement, altered application processes, or changes in eligibility criteria. Such changes frequently generate extensive debate among various political and social groups due to their significant economic, social, and humanitarian impacts. The dynamic nature of these policies means that specific rules and regulations can be updated and reinterpreted regularly.

Key Phrases

• 1. Keep up with (something)

  Meaning: To stay informed about or abreast of something.

  Example: “It’s hard to keep up with all the latest celebrity gossip.”

• 2. Whack-a-mole

  Meaning: A situation in which problems are solved only to be immediately replaced by new ones, suggesting a futile or unending struggle.

  Example: “Dealing with our old car’s repairs feels like a constant game of whack-a-mole; fix one thing, another breaks.”

• 3. Silver lining

  Meaning: An optimistic or comforting aspect of an otherwise gloomy, difficult, or negative situation.

  Example: “The silver lining of being stuck at home during the lockdown was spending more time with my family.”

• 4. Hoops to jump through

  Meaning: Obstacles, complicated procedures, or bureaucratic requirements that one must overcome to achieve something.

  Example: “Getting a passport can involve a lot of hoops to jump through, especially if you need it quickly.”

• 5. Sneak through the cracks

  Meaning: To manage to get through or avoid something, often unnoticed or by exploiting a loophole; to pass without being detected.

  Example: “We need to check the report carefully, otherwise, some errors might sneak through the cracks.”

Grammar Points

Practice Exercises

Answers

English Learning Content: United Nations Reform Proposals

Dialogue

Current Situation

The United Nations, established in 1945, faces persistent calls for reform to better address 21st-century global challenges. The necessity for reform stems from an evolving geopolitical landscape and new global threats.

• Security Council Expansion: This remains the most contentious issue. Proposals aim to make the Council more representative by adding new permanent and non-permanent members, reflecting today’s global power distribution. However, disagreements persist over which countries should gain permanent seats and whether new permanent members should have veto power.
• Administrative and Budgetary Reform: Efforts are focused on improving efficiency, transparency, and accountability within the UN Secretariat, its agencies, and peacekeeping operations. This includes streamlining bureaucracy, rationalizing the budget, and enhancing performance management.
• Strengthening Peacekeeping Operations: Proposals seek to enhance the effectiveness, safety, and operational capacity of UN peacekeepers, including clarifying mandates, securing adequate resources, and ensuring better protection of civilians.
• Human Rights and Development Agendas: Continuous work aims to strengthen human rights mechanisms and adapt development goals (like the Sustainable Development Goals) to evolving global needs, ensuring inclusivity and sustainability.
• Environmental Governance: There are proposals for better coordination and stronger mandates for the UN’s role in addressing critical issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation.

Challenges to reform are significant, including the veto power held by the five permanent Security Council members, the divergent national interests of 193 member states, and the inherent difficulty of achieving consensus on such broad and impactful changes. Progress is often slow, requiring extensive negotiation and compromise.

Key Phrases

• doing a triple somersault without a safety net: experiencing extreme mental difficulty or confusion.
  • Example: Trying to understand the new tax laws felt like my brain was doing a triple somersault without a safety net.
• diving into the deep end: starting something difficult or challenging without much preparation or experience.
  • Example: Moving to a new country without knowing the language was really diving into the deep end.
• sticking point: a point in a discussion or negotiation on which there is disagreement and which prevents further progress.
  • Example: The salary was the main sticking point in the job negotiations.
• political quagmire: a difficult, perplexing, or dangerous political situation from which it is hard to extricate oneself.
  • Example: The ongoing election disputes have created a real political quagmire.
• kicking the can down the road: procrastinating or delaying a decision or resolution, often passing the problem to a future time or person.
  • Example: Instead of solving the budget crisis, they just keep kicking the can down the road.
• a tall order: a difficult task or request.
  • Example: Finishing the entire report by tomorrow morning is a tall order.
• to herd cats: to attempt to control or organize a group of people or things that are difficult to manage.
  • Example: Getting all the volunteers to agree on a single schedule was like trying to herd cats.
• bureaucratic labyrinth: a complex and confusing system of rules, procedures, and official paperwork that makes it difficult to get things done.
  • Example: Navigating the university’s registration system felt like a bureaucratic labyrinth.
• on paper: theoretically; according to what has been written or stated, rather than in reality.
  • Example: The new business plan looks fantastic on paper, but we need to see if it’s feasible.
• teetering on the brink of disaster: being in a very precarious or dangerous situation, close to a catastrophic outcome.
  • Example: After several failed projects, the company was teetering on the brink of disaster.

Grammar Points

1. Modal Verbs for Suggestion and Possibility (Should, Could)

Modal verbs like “should” and “could” are used to express advice, possibility, or suggestion, rather than definite facts.

• Should: Used to give advice, make recommendations, or express a gentle obligation.
  • Example from dialogue: “Maybe I should just stick to reforming my sock drawer.” (Alice suggests an advisable action for herself.)
  • Explanation: It implies what is appropriate or correct to do.
• Could: Used to express possibility, make a suggestion, or talk about ability in the past.
  • Example from dialogue: “If they could just agree on a few key areas…” (Bob expresses a hopeful possibility if certain conditions are met.)
  • Explanation: Suggests something is possible or might happen under specific circumstances.

2. Idiomatic Expressions and Figurative Language

English often uses idioms (phrases with non-literal meanings) and figurative language (like metaphors and similes) to make conversations more vivid and expressive.

• Idiom: “diving into the deep end” (meaning starting something difficult without much preparation).
• Metaphor: “political quagmire” (comparing a difficult political situation to soft, muddy ground).
• Simile: “like trying to decide who gets the last slice of pizza” (comparing a difficult negotiation to a familiar, everyday struggle).
• Metaphor: “bureaucratic labyrinth” (comparing complex bureaucracy to a confusing maze).
• Idiom: “to herd cats” (meaning to try to manage unmanageable people or situations).
• Explanation: Learning these helps you understand natural English and express yourself more colorfully.

3. Phrasal Verbs

Phrasal verbs are combinations of a verb and a preposition or adverb (or both) that create a new meaning. They are very common in spoken English.

• Dive into: to start to do something enthusiastically or intensely.
  • Example: Alice felt like she was diving into the deep end with the UN proposals.
• Stick to: to continue doing something; not change.
  • Example: Alice thought she should stick to reforming her sock drawer.
• Kick the can down the road: to delay a decision or problem.
  • Example: The process seems to be kicking the can down the road year after year.
• Break through: to succeed in dealing with an obstacle or difficulty.
  • Example: Sometimes global crises are what it takes to break through the gridlock.
• Give up on: to stop hoping for or believing in someone or something.
  • Example: Bob advised Alice not to give up on the UN just yet.

Practice Exercises

Answers